Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

v3.3.1.900
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as either an asset or a liability (in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively) and measured at fair value.
Derivative financial instruments can be designated as accounting hedges under GAAP. Designating a derivative as an accounting hedge allows Huntington to recognize gains and losses, less any ineffectiveness, in the income statement within the same period that the hedged item affects earnings. Gains and losses on derivatives that are not designated to an effective hedge relationship under GAAP immediately impact earnings within the period they occur.
Derivatives used in Asset and Liability Management Activities
Huntington engages in balance sheet hedging activity, principally for asset liability management purposes, to convert fixed rate assets or liabilities into floating rate or vice versa. Balance sheet hedging activity is arranged to receive hedge accounting treatment and is classified as either fair value or cash flow hedges. Fair value hedges are purchased to convert deposits and subordinated and other long-term debt from fixed-rate obligations to floating rate. Cash flow hedges are also used to convert floating rate loans made to customers into fixed rate loans.


The following table presents the gross notional values of derivatives used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at September 30, 2015, identified by the underlying interest rate-sensitive instruments:
(dollar amounts in thousands )
Fair Value Hedges
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Total
Instruments associated with:
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
—

 
$
9,048,000

 
$
9,048,000

Deposits
69,100

 
—

 
69,100

Subordinated notes
475,000

 
—

 
475,000

Long-term debt
4,535,000

 
—

 
4,535,000

Total notional value at September 30, 2015
$
5,079,100

 
$
9,048,000

 
$
14,127,100



The following table presents additional information about the interest rate swaps used in Huntington’s asset and liability management activities at September 30, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-Average
Rate
(dollar amounts in thousands )
Notional Value
 
Average Maturity (years)
 
Fair Value
 
Receive
 
Pay
Asset conversion swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Receive fixed—generic
$
9,048,000

 
1.2

 
$
23,912

 
0.81
%
 
0.28
%
Total asset conversion swaps
9,048,000

 
1.2

 
23,912

 
0.81

 
0.28

Liability conversion swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Receive fixed—generic
5,079,100

 
2.9

 
107,185

 
1.61

 
0.32

Total liability conversion swaps
5,079,100

 
2.9

 
107,185

 
1.61

 
0.32

Total swap portfolio at September 30, 2015
$
14,127,100

 
1.8

 
$
131,097

 
1.10
%
 
0.30
%

These derivative financial instruments were entered into for the purpose of managing the interest rate risk of assets and liabilities. Consequently, net amounts receivable or payable on contracts hedging either interest earning assets or interest bearing liabilities were accrued as an adjustment to either interest income or interest expense. The net amounts resulted in an increase to net interest income of $28.3 million and $24.2 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, the net amounts resulted in an increase to net interest income of $79.2 million and $73.4 million, respectively.
In connection with the sale of Huntington’s Class B Visa® shares, Huntington entered into a swap agreement with the purchaser of the shares. The swap agreement adjusts for dilution in the conversion ratio of Class B shares resulting from the Visa® litigation. At September 30, 2015, the fair value of the swap liability of $0.4 million is an estimate of the exposure liability based upon Huntington’s assessment of the potential Visa® litigation losses.
The following table presents the fair values at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 of Huntington’s derivatives that are designated and not designated as hedging instruments. Amounts in the table below are presented gross without the impact of any net collateral arrangements:
Asset derivatives included in accrued income and other assets:
(dollar amounts in thousands)
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments
$
131,097

 
$
53,114

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments
240,229

 
183,610

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments
41,033

 
32,798

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments
108,409

 
180,218

Total contracts
$
520,768

 
$
449,740

Liability derivatives included in accrued expenses and other liabilities:
(dollar amounts in thousands)
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments
$
—

 
$
12,648

Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments
167,854

 
110,627

Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments
37,919

 
29,754

Commodities contracts not designated as hedging instruments
105,634

 
179,180

Total contracts
$
311,407

 
$
332,209


The changes in fair value of the fair value hedges are, to the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, recorded through earnings and offset against changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
The following table presents the change in fair value for derivatives designated as fair value hedges as well as the offsetting change in fair value on the hedged item for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, and 2014:
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging deposits (1)
$
(265
)
 
$
(323
)
 
$
(723
)
 
$
(829
)
Change in fair value of hedged deposits (1)
259

 
315

 
709

 
809

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging subordinated notes (2)
5,328

 
(6,601
)
 
1,196

 
(2,520
)
Change in fair value of hedged subordinated notes (2)
(5,328
)
 
6,601

 
(1,196
)
 
2,520

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging other long-term debt (2)
37,272

 
(13,196
)
 
49,168

 
(6,943
)
Change in fair value of hedged other long-term debt (2)
(36,283
)
 
12,924

 
(48,546
)
 
9,450

(1)
Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—deposits in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
(2)
Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense—subordinated notes and other long-term debt in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, changes in the derivatives’ fair value will not be included in current earnings but are reported as a component of OCI in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when earnings are also affected by the changes in the hedged cash flows. To the extent these derivatives are not effective, changes in their fair values are immediately included in noninterest income.
The following table presents the gains and (losses) recognized in OCI and the location in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income of gains and (losses) reclassified from OCI into earnings for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, and 2014 for derivatives designated as effective cash flow hedges:
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
Amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in
OCI on derivatives
(effective portion)
(after-tax)
 
Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from
accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)
 
Amount of (gain) or loss
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
into earnings
(effective portion)
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
 
 
Three months ended September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
8,301

 
$
(21,133
)
 
Interest and fee income - loans and leases
 
$
(73
)
 
$
(148
)
Investment Securities
—

 
—

 
Noninterest income - other income
 
—

 
—

Total
$
8,301

 
$
(21,133
)
 
 
 
$
(73
)
 
$
(148
)
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
Amount of gain or
(loss) recognized in
OCI on derivatives
(effective portion)
(after-tax)
 
Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from
accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion)
 
Amount of (gain) or loss
reclassified from
accumulated OCI
into earnings
(effective portion)
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
 
 
Nine months ended September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)
2015
 
2014
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
26,057

 
$
(1,596
)
 
Interest and fee income - loans and leases
 
$
(323
)
 
$
(3,853
)
Investment Securities
—

 
—

 
Interest and fee income - investment securities
 
(11
)
 
—

Total
$
26,057

 
$
(1,596
)
 
 
 
$
(334
)
 
$
(3,853
)

Reclassified gains and losses on swaps related to loans and investment securities and swaps related to subordinated debt are recorded within interest income and interest expense, respectively. During the next twelve months, Huntington expects to reclassify to earnings $15.6 million after-tax unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives currently in OCI.
The following table details the gains and (losses) recognized in noninterest income on the ineffective portion on interest rate contracts for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(dollar amounts in thousands)
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
$
888

 
$
224

 
$
858

 
$
195


Derivatives used in mortgage banking activities
Mortgage loan origination hedging activity

Huntington’s mortgage origination hedging activity is related to the hedging of the mortgage pricing commitments to customers and the secondary sale to third parties. The value of a newly originated mortgage is not firm until the interest rate is committed or locked. The interest rate lock commitments are derivative positions offset by forward commitments to sell loans.

Huntington uses two types of mortgage-backed securities in its forward commitment to sell loans. The first type of forward commitment is a “To Be Announced” (or TBA), the second is a “Specified Pool” mortgage-backed security. Huntington uses these derivatives to hedge the value of mortgage-backed securities until they are sold.
The following table summarizes the derivative assets and liabilities used in mortgage banking activities:
(dollar amounts in thousands)
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Derivative assets:
 
 
 
Interest rate lock agreements
$
8,339

 
$
4,064

Forward trades and options
34

 
35

Total derivative assets
8,373

 
4,099

Derivative liabilities:
 
 
 
Interest rate lock agreements
(110
)
 
(259
)
Forward trades and options
(5,490
)
 
(3,760
)
Total derivative liabilities
(5,600
)
 
(4,019
)
Net derivative asset (liability)
$
2,773

 
$
80


MSR hedging activity
Huntington’s MSR economic hedging activity uses securities and derivatives to manage the value of the MSR asset and to mitigate the various types of risk inherent in the MSR asset, including risks related to duration, basis, convexity, volatility, and yield curve. The hedging instruments include forward commitments, interest rate swaps, and options on interest rate swaps.
The total notional value of these derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was $0.5 billion and $0.6 billion, respectively. The total notional amount at September 30, 2015, corresponds to trading assets with a fair value of $2.9 million and no trading liabilities. Net trading gains and (losses) related to MSR hedging for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, were $5.7 million and $(0.2) million, and $1.9 million and $3.8 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These amounts are included in mortgage banking income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Derivatives used in trading activities
Various derivative financial instruments are offered to enable customers to meet their financing and investing objectives and for their risk management purposes. Derivative financial instruments used in trading activities consisted of commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange contracts. The derivative contracts grant the option holder the right to buy or sell an underlying financial instrument for a predetermined price before the contract expires. Huntington may enter into offsetting third-party contracts with approved, reputable counterparties with substantially matching terms and currencies in order to economically hedge significant exposure related to derivatives used in trading activities.
The interest rate risk of customer derivatives is mitigated by entering into similar derivatives having offsetting terms with other counterparties. The credit risk to these customers is evaluated and included in the calculation of fair value. Foreign currency derivatives help the customer hedge risk and reduce exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates. Transactions are primarily in liquid currencies with Canadian dollars and Euros comprising a majority of all transactions.
The net fair values of these derivative financial instruments, for which the gross amounts are included in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were $75.8 million and $74.4 million, respectively. The total notional values of derivative financial instruments used by Huntington on behalf of customers, including offsetting derivatives, were $14.7 billion and $14.4 billion at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Huntington’s credit risks from interest rate swaps used for trading purposes were $272.0 million and $219.3 million at the same dates, respectively.
Risk Participation Agreements

Huntington periodically enters into risk participation agreement in order to manage credit risk of its derivative positions. These agreements transfer counterparty credit risk related to interest rate swaps to and from other financial institutions. Huntington can mitigate exposure to certain counterparties or take on exposure to generate additional income. Huntington’s notional exposure for interest rate swaps originated by other financial institutions was $397.4 million and $456.7 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Huntington will make payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under the terms of the underlying interest rate derivative contract. The amount Huntington will have to pay if all counterparties defaulted on their swap contracts is the fair value of these risk participations, which was $10.2 million and $7.2 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These contracts mature between 2015 and 2043 and are deemed investment grade.
Financial assets and liabilities that are offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Huntington records derivatives at fair value as further described in Note 14. Huntington records these derivatives net of any master netting arrangement in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Collateral agreements are regularly entered into as part of the underlying derivative agreements with Huntington’s counterparties to mitigate counterparty credit risk.
All derivatives are carried on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Derivative balances are presented on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. Cash collateral exchanged with counterparties is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values. Huntington enters into derivative transactions with two primary groups: broker-dealers and banks, and Huntington’s customers. Different methods are utilized for managing counterparty credit exposure and credit risk for each of these groups.
Huntington enters into transactions with broker-dealers and banks for various risk management purposes. These types of transactions generally are high dollar volume. Huntington enters into bilateral collateral and master netting agreements with these counterparties, and routinely exchange cash and high quality securities collateral with these counterparties. Huntington enters into transactions with customers to meet their financing, investing, payment and risk management needs. These types of transactions generally are low dollar volume. Huntington generally enters into master netting agreements with customer counterparties, however collateral is generally not exchanged with customer counterparties.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, aggregate credit risk associated with these derivatives, net of collateral that has been pledged by the counterparty, was $15.9 million and $19.5 million, respectively. The credit risk associated with interest rate swaps is calculated after considering master netting agreements with broker-dealers and banks.
At September 30, 2015, Huntington pledged $99.2 million of investment securities and cash collateral to counterparties, while other counterparties pledged $123.8 million of investment securities and cash collateral to Huntington to satisfy collateral netting agreements. In the event of credit downgrades, Huntington would not be required to provide additional collateral.
The following tables present the gross amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to arrive at the net amounts recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross amounts not offset in
the condensed consolidated
balance sheets
 
 
(dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
 
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 
Net amounts of
assets
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 
Financial
instruments
 
Cash collateral
received
 
Net amount
Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2015
Derivatives
$
530,788

 
$
(79,204
)
 
$
451,584

 
$
(42,289
)
 
$
(3,983
)
 
$
405,312

December 31, 2014
Derivatives
480,803

 
(128,161
)
 
352,642

 
(27,744
)
 
(1,095
)
 
323,803


Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross amounts not offset in
the condensed consolidated
balance sheets
 
 
(dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
 
Gross amounts
offset in the
condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 
Net amounts of
liabilities
presented in
the condensed
consolidated
balance sheets
 
Financial
instruments
 
Cash collateral
delivered
 
Net amount
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2015
Derivatives
$
318,653

 
$
(28,976
)
 
$
289,677

 
$
(71,556
)
 
$
(377
)
 
$
217,744

December 31, 2014
Derivatives
363,192

 
(78,937
)
 
284,255

 
(78,654
)
 
(111
)
 
205,490