EXHIBIT 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 21, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contacts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysts
|
|
|
|
Media |
|
|
Jay Gould
|
|
(614) 480-4060
|
|
Maureen Brown
|
|
(614) 480-5512 |
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES RETURNS TO PROFITABILITY
REPORTS FIRST QUARTER NET INCOME OF $39.7 MILLION, OR $0.01 PER
COMMON SHARE
INCLUDES $38.2 MILLION NET TAX BENEFIT
FIFTH CONSECUTIVE QUARTERLY IMPROVEMENT IN PRE-TAX,
PRE-PROVISION EARNINGS TO $251.8 MILLION
CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT IN CREDIT QUALITY
ANTICIPATES FULL YEAR PROFIT FOR 2010
COLUMBUS, Ohio Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (NASDAQ: HBAN;
www.huntington.com) reported 2010 first quarter net income of $39.7 million, or $0.01 per
common share, including a $38.2 million net tax benefit. This compared with a net loss of $369.7
million, or $0.56 per common share, in the 2009 fourth quarter and a net loss of $2,433.2 million,
or $6.79 per common share, in the year-ago quarter. Comparisons between quarters were impacted by
several significant items (see Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparisons below
for details).
First quarter results represented a very significant step forward for Huntington. Last
October, we said it was important that Huntington return to profitability as soon as possible,
said Stephen D. Steinour, chairman, president, and chief executive officer. We are very pleased
to have reached this goal a year faster than the analyst consensus anticipated. These results
reflected the cumulative hard work and combined dedication of colleagues throughout the company
over the last year to position the company for better long-term performance.
Our balance sheet and liquidity positions are strong, he continued. We are delivering
earnings momentum. Credit trends continue to improve. Capital levels are solid. We expect to
report a profit for full year 2010.
Cash and investment securities at March 31 were $10.3 billion, up 43% from a year ago.
Period-end loans and leases represented 92% of deposits, significantly improved from 101% at the
end of March last year. During the quarter, average total core deposits grew at a 5% annualized
rate and were 13% higher than in the year-ago quarter.
Our five consecutive quarters of growth in pre-tax, pre-provision earnings is a significant
achievement during this period of great challenges, said Steinour.
Pre-tax, pre-provision earnings in the 2010 first quarter were $251.8 million, up 4% from
$242.1 million in the 2009 fourth quarter, and 12% higher than in the year-ago quarter. This
quarters improvement was primarily driven by higher net interest income, as the net interest
margin increased to 3.47% from 3.19% in the prior quarter.
Average total loans and leases declined slightly as decreases in commercial loans, primarily
commercial real estate, were only partially offset by an increase in average total consumer loans.
This quarter showed continued improvement in credit quality trends and confirms our
expectation that 2009 would represent the high water mark for credit-related problems, he
continued. Going forward, we anticipate we will continue to see improvement in the level of the
provision for credit losses and net charge-offs.
Net charge-offs in the first quarter were $238.5 million, or an annualized 2.58%, of average
total loans and leases. This was down 46% from $444.7 million, or an annualized 4.80%, in the
2009 fourth quarter. Total nonperforming assets at March 31, 2010 were $1,918.4 million, down 7%
from $2,058.1 million at December 31, 2009. The primary driver for the decrease was a 52% decline
in new nonperforming assets. There was also a 7% decline in commercial criticized loans, the
first decrease in well over a year.
With a $235.0 million provision for credit losses only slightly less than net charge-offs, the
period end allowance for credit losses represented 4.14% of total loans and leases, basically
unchanged from 4.16% at the end of last year. The period-end allowance for credit losses as a
percent of period-end nonaccrual loans increased to 87% from 80%, reflecting the decline in
nonperforming assets and an allowance for credit losses that was little changed.
Maintaining a solid capital base is important to the stability of the company, said
Steinour.
The tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio improved to 5.96% from 5.92% at the end of
last year. Tier 1 and Total regulatory risk-based capital ratios at March 31, 2010 were 11.94% and
14.24%, respectively, down slightly from the end of last year, but $2.5 billion and $1.8 billion,
respectively, above the regulatory well capitalized thresholds.
Returning to profitability quickly is a very significant achievement. Reporting a profit for
full year 2010 will positively differentiate our performance from that of some other regional
banks. Yet, we are mindful there is much left for us to accomplish. Our performance is not yet at
the level where we can fulfill our commitment to fully reward our shareholders. Driven with focus
and a sense of urgency, we will get stronger every day, Steinour concluded.
FIRST QUARTER PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW COMPARED WITH 2009 FOURTH QUARTER
|
|
Net income of $39.7 million, or $0.01 per common share, compared with a net loss of $369.7
million, or $0.56 per common share. |
|
|
|
Current quarter includes a net tax benefit of $38.2 million, or $0.05 per common share. |
|
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision income of $251.8 million, up $9.8 million, or 4%, reflecting a $19.6
million, or 5%, linked-quarter increase in fully-taxable equivalent net interest income. |
|
|
|
5% annualized growth in average total core deposits. |
|
|
|
3.47% fully-taxable equivalent net interest margin, up from 3.19%. |
- 2 -
|
|
Continued improvement in credit quality trends. |
|
|
|
7% decline in total nonperforming assets to $1,918.4 million from $2,058.1 million,
including a 52% decline in new nonperforming assets. |
|
|
|
46% decline in net charge-offs to $238.5 million, or an annualized 2.58% of average
total loans and leases, from $444.7 million, or an annualized 4.80%. |
|
|
|
$235.0 million loan loss provision expense, down from $894.0 million. |
|
|
|
4.14% period-end allowance for credit losses to total loans and leases, compared with
4.16%. |
|
|
|
87% allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans coverage ratio, up from 80%. |
|
|
|
11.94% and 14.24% regulatory Tier 1 and Total capital ratios, down from 12.03% and
14.41%, respectively, and $2.5 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, above the well
capitalized thresholds. |
|
|
|
5.96% tangible common equity ratio, up from 5.92%. |
Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons
From time to time, revenue, expenses, or taxes are impacted by items judged by Management to
be outside of ordinary banking activities and/or by items that, while they may be associated with
ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by
Management at that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. Management believes the
disclosure of Significant Items in current and prior period results aids analysts/investors in
better understanding corporate performance trends. (See Significant Items under the Basis of
Presentation for a full discussion).
Specific significant items impacting 2010 first quarter performance included (see Table 1
below):
|
|
|
$38.2 million after-tax net tax benefit recognized ($0.05 per common share), primarily
reflecting the increase in the net deferred tax asset relating to the assets acquired from
Franklin in 2009. |
Table 1 Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparisons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Impact (1) |
|
(in millions, except per share) |
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
EPS (2) |
|
March 31, 2010 GAAP income |
|
$ |
39.7 |
(2) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Net tax benefit recognized |
|
|
38.2 |
(2) |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 GAAP loss |
|
$ |
(369.7 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
Net gain on the early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance benefit |
|
|
11.3 |
(2) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 GAAP loss |
|
$ |
(2,433.2 |
)(2) |
|
$ |
(6.79 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
(2,602.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.09 |
) |
Franklin relationship restructuring |
|
|
159.9 |
(2) |
|
|
0.44 |
|
Preferred stock conversion deemed dividend |
|
NA |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Favorable (unfavorable) impact on GAAP earnings; pre-tax unless otherwise noted |
|
(2) |
|
After-tax; EPS reflected on a fully diluted basis |
|
NA- |
|
Not applicable |
- 3 -
Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income Trends
One performance metric that Management believes is useful in analyzing performance is the
level of earnings adjusted to exclude provision expense and certain Significant Items. (See
Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income in Basis of Presentation for a full discussion).
Table 2 shows pre-tax, pre-provision income was $251.8 million in the 2010 first quarter, up
4% from the prior quarter.
Table 2 Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
(in millions) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
(598.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(257.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(137.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,685.0 |
) |
Add: Provision for credit losses |
|
|
235.0 |
|
|
|
894.0 |
|
|
|
475.1 |
|
|
|
413.7 |
|
|
|
291.8 |
|
Less: Securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
Add: Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Less: Significant items (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(2,602.7 |
) |
Gain related to Visa® stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC special assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income (1) |
|
$ |
251.8 |
|
|
$ |
242.1 |
|
|
$ |
237.1 |
|
|
$ |
229.3 |
|
|
$ |
224.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linked-quarter change amount |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
Linked-quarter change percent |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Basis of Presentation for definition |
|
(2) |
|
Only includes transactions deemed significant |
As discussed in the sections that follow, the improvement from the 2009 fourth quarter
primarily reflected higher net interest income.
Net Interest Income, Net Interest Margin, and Average Balance Sheet
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 Fourth Quarter
Compared with the 2009 fourth quarter, fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased
$19.6 million, or 5%. This reflected an increase in the net interest margin to 3.47% from 3.19%,
as average earnings assets declined $0.6 billion, or 1%. The decrease in average earning assets
primarily reflected a $0.4 billion, or 4%, decrease in average investment securities, as average
total loans and leases were down only $0.1 billion, or less than 1%.
The net interest margin increase reflected a combination of factors including better pricing
on both deposits and loans. It also reflected the benefits of asset and liability management
strategies to reduce the asset sensitivity of the balance sheet over the next year while
maintaining the flexibility to be prepared for a rising rate environment.
- 4 -
Table 3 details the decrease in average total loans and leases.
Table 3 Loans and Leases 1Q10 vs. 4Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in billions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Average Loans and Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total loans and leases declined $0.1 billion, reflecting a $1.0 billion, or 5% decline
in total commercial loans, partially offset by a $0.9 billion, or 6%, increase in average total
consumer loans.
Average commercial and industrial (C&I) loans were $0.3 billion, or 2%, lower in the quarter,
reflecting a reclassification of $0.3 billion of variable rate demand notes to municipal
securities. Underlying growth was more than offset by a combination of continued lower
line-of-credit utilization and pay-downs on term debt. It is clear that the economic environment
has caused many customers to actively reduce their leverage position. Our line-of-credit
utilization percentage was 42%, consistent with that of the prior quarter. Yet, we continue to be
pleased with the level of new business opportunities we are seeing as our pipeline continues to
expand.
Average commercial real estate loans (CRE) declined $0.8 billion, or 9%, primarily resulting
from the pay-down and charge-off activity in the quarter. While charge-offs remain a significant
contributor to the decline in balances, we also continued to see substantial net pay-downs totaling
$135 million for the quarter. The pay-down activity was a result of our portfolio management and
loan workout strategies, and some very early stage improvements in the markets.
Average total consumer loans increased $0.9 billion, or 6%, reflecting a $0.9 billion, or 28%,
increase in average automobile loans and leases, of which $0.8 billion was the result of adopting
ASC 810 Consolidation. At the end of first quarter of 2009, we transferred $1.0 billion of
automobile loans to a trust in a securitization transaction as part of a funding strategy. Upon
adoption of the new accounting standard, the trust was consolidated as of January 1, 2010 and at
March 31, 2010, the loans had a remaining balance of $0.7 billion. Average residential mortgages
increased $0.1 billion, or 1%. Average home equity loans were essentially unchanged from the prior
quarter.
The $0.4 billion, or 4%, decrease in average total investment securities reflected normal
maturities.
Our March 31, 2010 liquidity position remained strong as we had $10.3 billion of cash and
investment securities, up 43% from a year ago, and our loan-to-deposit ratio was 92%, up from 91%
at December 31, 2009. The slight increase in the loan-to-deposit ratio from last year end
reflected the impact of bringing the automobile loan securitization back on the balance sheet.
- 5 -
Table 4 details changes within the various deposit categories as average total deposits were
unchanged.
Table 4 Deposits 1Q10 vs. 4Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in billions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Average Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Other deposits |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total deposits were unchanged from the prior quarter reflecting:
|
|
|
$0.5 billion, or 1%, growth in average total core deposits. The primary drivers of this
change were 12% growth in average money market deposits, 4% growth in interest bearing
demand deposits, and 2% increase in noninterest bearing demand deposits. These increases
were partially offset by a $0.9 billion, or 8%, decline in average core certificates of
deposit, reflecting our focus on growing money market and transaction accounts. Average
savings and other domestic deposits declined $0.1 billion, or 2%. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.5 billion, or 22%, decline in brokered deposits and negotiable CDs, reflecting the
intentional reduction in noncore funding sources given the growth in core deposits. |
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 First Quarter
Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $55.1 million, or 16%, from the
year-ago quarter. This reflected the favorable impact of the significant increase in the net
interest margin to 3.47% from 2.97% as average total earnings assets declined $0.3 billion, or less
than 1%. Though average total earnings assets were little changed from the year-ago quarter, this
reflected a $4.0 billion, or 91%, increase in average total investment securities, mostly offset by
a $3.9 billion, or 10%, decline in average total loans and leases.
Table 5 details the $3.9 billion, or 10%, decrease in average total loans and leases.
Table 5 Loans and Leases 1Q10 vs. 1Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in billions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Average Loans and Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Home equity |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other consumer |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 6 -
The decrease in average total loans and leases reflected:
|
|
|
$3.7 billion, or 15%, decrease in average total commercial loans. The $1.2 billion, or
9%, decline in average C&I loans reflected a general decrease in borrowing as reflected in
a decline in line-of-credit utilization, including significant reductions in our automobile
dealer floorplan exposure, charge-off activity, the 2009 first quarter Franklin
restructuring, and the reclassification in the current quarter of variable rate demand
notes to municipal securities. These negatives were partially offset by the impact of the
reclassifications in 2009 of certain CRE loans, primarily representing owner occupied
properties, to C&I loans. The $2.4 billion, or 24%, decrease in average CRE loans
reflected our ongoing commitment to de-risk the balance sheet. We are executing on a
number of plans, which have resulted in portfolio reductions through payoffs and pay-downs,
as well as the impact of charge-offs. |
|
|
|
$0.2 billion, or 1%, decrease in average total consumer loans. This decrease primarily
reflected a $0.3 billion decline in average automobile leases due to the continued run-off
of that portfolio, partially offset by a $0.2 billion increase in average automobile loans.
The increase in average automobile loans reflected a 70% increase in loan originations
from the year-ago quarter. The decline in average residential mortgages reflected the
impact of loan sales, as well as the continued refinance of portfolio loans and the related
increased sale of fixed-rate originations, partially offset by additions related to the
2009 first quarter Franklin restructuring. Average home equity loans were little changed
as lower origination volume was offset by slower runoff experience and slightly higher line
utilization. Increased line usage continued to be associated with higher quality customers
taking advantage of the low interest rate environment. |
The $4.0 billion, or 91%, increase in average total investment securities reflected the
deployment of the cash from core deposit growth and loan runoff over this period, as well as the
proceeds from 2009 capital actions (See Capital for a full discussion).
Table 6 details the $2.0 billion, or 5%, increase in average total deposits.
Table 6 Deposits 1Q10 vs. 1Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in billions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Average Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Demand deposits interest bearing |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Other deposits |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in average total deposits from the year-ago quarter reflected:
|
|
|
$4.2 billion, or 13%, growth in average total core deposits. The primary drivers of
this change were 85% growth in average money market deposits, 40% growth in average
interest bearing demand deposits, and 20% growth in average noninterest bearing demand
deposits. These increases were partially offset by a $2.8 billion, or 22%, decline in
average core certificates of deposit and a $0.4 billion, or 8%, decline in average savings
and other domestic deposits. |
- 7 -
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
A $1.6 billion, or 47%, decline in brokered deposits and negotiable CDs and a $0.4
billion, or 35%, decrease in average other domestic deposits over $250,000, primarily
reflecting the reduction of noncore funding sources. |
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses in the 2010 first quarter was $235.0 million, down $659.0
million, or 74%, from the prior quarter and down $56.8 million, or 19%, from the year-ago quarter.
The current quarters provision for credit losses essentially matched the $238.5 million of net
charge-offs (see Credit Quality discussion).
Noninterest Income
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest income decreased $3.7 million, or 2%, from the 2009 fourth quarter.
Table 7 Noninterest Income 1Q10 vs. 4Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
69.3 |
|
|
$ |
76.8 |
|
|
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Trust services |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Automobile operating lease income |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Securities losses |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Other income |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
240.9 |
|
|
$ |
244.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in total noninterest income reflected:
|
|
|
$7.4 million, or 10%, decline in service charges on deposit accounts, reflecting
seasonally lower personal service charges, mostly NSF/OD-related. |
|
|
|
$5.4 million, or 16%, decline in other income, as the prior quarter included a benefit
from the change in fair value of our derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$3.6 million, or 11%, increase in brokerage and insurance income, including a 17%
increase in insurance income, reflecting improved sales and seasonal factors. |
|
|
|
$2.6 million improvement in securities losses as the prior quarter reflected $2.6
million in securities losses. |
|
|
|
$2.4 million, or 17%, increase in bank owned life insurance income, reflecting $2.1
million in realized policy benefits. |
- 8 -
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 First Quarter
Noninterest income increased $1.8 million, or 1%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 8 Noninterest Income 1Q10 vs. 1Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
69.3 |
|
|
$ |
69.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Brokerage and insurance income |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Trust services |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Automobile operating lease income |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Securities losses |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Other income |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
240.9 |
|
|
$ |
239.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in total noninterest income reflected:
|
|
|
$10.7 million, or 58%, increase in other income, as the year-ago quarter included a $5.9
million automobile loan securitization loss. The improvement also reflected growth in
standby letter of credit fees and trading income. |
|
|
|
$3.6 million, or 28%, increase in bank owned life insurance income, reflecting $2.6
million in realized policy benefits. |
|
|
|
$3.0 million, or 12%, increase in trust services income, reflecting the positive impact
of higher asset market values, as well as increased activity. |
|
|
|
$2.7 million, or 12%, increase in electronic banking income. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$10.4 million, or 29%, decline in mortgage banking income, reflecting a $16.4 million,
or 55%, decline in origination and secondary marketing income as originations in the
current quarter were down 44% from the year-ago quarter, partially offset by a net benefit
from MSR valuation and hedging activity. |
|
|
|
$4.2 million, or 10%, decline in brokerage and insurance income, reflecting a $1.4
million, or 8%, decline in investment product income, primarily due to a 21% decline in
annuity sales volume, as well as a $2.8 million, or 13%, decline in insurance income,
primarily due to lower contingent fees. |
|
|
|
$2.1 million of securities gains in the year-ago quarter. |
Noninterest Expense
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest expense increased $75.5 million, or 23%, from the 2009 fourth quarter.
- 9 -
Table 9 Noninterest Expense 1Q10 vs. 4Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
183.6 |
|
|
$ |
180.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.6 |
) |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
NM |
|
Other expense |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
398.1 |
|
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The 2009 fourth quarter gain related to the
purchase of certain subordinated bank notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
The increase in noninterest expense reflected:
|
|
|
$73.6 million gain on the early extinguishment of debt that lowered the prior quarters
net interest expense. |
|
|
|
$3.0 million, or 17%, increase in other expenses, primarily reflecting higher franchise
and other taxes. |
|
|
|
$3.0 million, or 2%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting higher salaries due to a 4%
increase in full-time equivalent staff as well as a seasonal increase in FICA-related
benefits expense, partially offset by lower commission expense. |
|
|
|
$2.8 million, or 11%, increase in net occupancy expense, primarily reflecting higher
seasonal snow removal expense. |
|
|
|
$2.3 million, or 6%, increase in outside data processing and other services expense,
primarily reflecting an increase in outside computer expenses. |
|
|
|
$2.1 million, or 23%, increase in marketing expense, reflecting an increase in product
advertising activities. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$7.0 million, or 38%, decrease in OREO and foreclosure expense. |
|
|
|
$2.4 million, or 10%, decrease in professional services, reflecting lower commercial
loan collection-related expenses. |
2010 First Quarter versus 2009 First Quarter
Noninterest expense decreased $2,571.7 million, or 87%, from the year-ago quarter.
- 10 -
Table 10 Noninterest Expense 1Q10 vs. 1Q09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
183.6 |
|
|
$ |
175.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Outside data processing and other
services |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0 |
) |
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,602.7 |
|
|
|
(2,602.7 |
) |
|
NM |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
NM |
|
Other expense |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
398.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,969.8 |
|
|
$ |
(2,571.7 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
The decrease reflected:
|
|
|
$2,602.7 million of goodwill impairment in the year-ago quarter. |
|
|
|
$2.0 million, or 12%, decline in amortization of intangibles. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$7.7 million, or 4%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting a 1% increase in full-time
equivalent staff, which contributed to higher salaries and sales commission expense in the
current period, as well as lower benefits expense in the year-ago period. |
|
|
|
$7.3 million, or 42%, increase in deposit and other insurance expense primarily due to
higher FDIC insurance costs as premiums rates increased and the level of deposits grew. |
|
|
|
$6.2 million, or 38%, increase in professional services, reflecting higher commercial
loan collection-related expenses, as well as an increase in consulting expenses. |
|
|
|
$2.9 million, or 36%, increase in marketing expense, reflecting an increase in product
advertising activities. |
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes in the 2010 first quarter was a benefit of $38.1 million. This
amount included the increase in the net deferred tax asset relating to the assets acquired from
Franklin in 2009 offset by a decrease in net deferred tax assets resulting from certain provisions
of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 relating to post retirement
prescription drug coverage. At March 31, 2010, we had a net deferred tax asset of $557.2 million.
Based on our level of our forecast of future taxable income, there was no impairment of the
deferred tax asset at March 31, 2010.
- 11 -
Credit Quality Performance Discussion
Credit quality performance in the 2010 first quarter continued to improve. Net charge-offs
declined 46% from the prior quarter and represented the lowest level since the third quarter of
2008. Nonperforming assets (NPAs) decreased 7% during the quarter. Contributing to this was a 52%
decline in new nonperforming assets to $237.9 million, also the lowest level since the third
quarter of 2008. The economic environment remains challenging, which is why we felt it prudent to
maintain our period end allowance at 4.14% of total loans and leases, essentially
unchanged from the end of the prior quarter.
Net Charge-Offs (NCOs)
Table 11 Net Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
(in millions) |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
75.4 |
|
|
$ |
109.8 |
|
|
$ |
68.8 |
|
|
$ |
98.3 |
|
|
$ |
210.6 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
258.1 |
|
|
|
169.2 |
|
|
|
172.6 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
160.7 |
|
|
|
367.9 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
|
|
270.9 |
|
|
|
293.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Residential mortgage (4) |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
117.9 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
238.5 |
|
|
$ |
444.7 |
|
|
$ |
355.9 |
|
|
$ |
334.4 |
|
|
$ |
341.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs annualized percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial (1) (2) (3) |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
6.22 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
12.21 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
|
|
|
7.51 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans and leases |
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
Residential mortgage (4) |
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2009 third quarter included net recoveries totaling $4.1 million associated with the Franklin restructuring. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2009 second quarter included net recoveries totaling $9.9 million associated with the Franklin restructuring. |
|
(3) |
|
The 2009 first quarter included net charge-offs totaling $128.3 million associated with the Franklin restructuring. |
|
(4) |
|
Effective with the 2009 third quarter, a change to accelerate the timing for when a partial charge-off is
recognized was made. This change resulted in $32.0 million of charge-offs in the 2009 third quarter. |
- 12 -
Total net charge-offs for the 2010 first quarter were $238.5 million, or an annualized 2.58% of average total loans and leases. This was down $206.3 million, or 46%, from $444.7 million, or an annualized 4.80%, in the 2009 fourth quarter. This improvement from the prior quarter reflected a $207.2 million, or 56%, decline in total commercial net charge-offs, partially offset by a $0.9 million, or 1%, increase in total consumer net charge-offs.
Total
C&I net charge-offs for the 2010 first quarter were $75.4 million, or an annualized
2.45%, down 31% from $109.8 million, or an annualized 3.49% of related loans, in the 2009 fourth
quarter. First quarter results were positively affected by a reduced level of large dollar
charge-offs. In the prior quarter, $39.5 million of charge-offs were associated with the activity
on five relationships. In the current quarter there was only one loss in excess of $5 million.
There continues to be improvement in delinquencies, with a 25% reduction in early stage
delinquencies from the prior quarter, the first quarterly decline since 2008. While there
continues to be concern regarding the impact of the economic conditions on our commercial
customers, the lower inflow of new nonaccruals, the reduction in criticized loans, and the
significant decline in early stage delinquencies supports our outlook for improved credit quality
performance in 2010.
Current quarter CRE net charge-offs were $85.3 million, or an annualized 4.44%, down 67% from
$258.1 million, or an annualized 12.21% in the prior quarter. As with C&I loans, a decrease in the
number of losses in excess of $5 million was the primary driver of the lower level of charge-offs
compared with the prior quarter. Retail projects and single family homebuilders continued to
represent a significant portion, or 52%, of the losses. The improvement was evident
across all of our regions. Based on the portfolio management processes, including charge-off
activity over the past two and one half years, the credit issues in the single family homebuilder
portfolio have been substantially addressed. The retail property portfolio remains more
susceptible to the ongoing market disruption, but we also believe that the combination of prior
charge-offs and existing reserve balances positions us well to make effective credit decisions in
the future. We continued our ongoing portfolio management efforts during the quarter, including
obtaining updated appraisals on properties and assessing a project status within the context of
market environment expectations.
Total consumer net charge-offs in the current quarter were $77.7 million, or an annualized
1.83%, up only 1% from $76.8 million in the fourth quarter. The decline in the annualized net
charge-off rate to 1.83% from 1.91% reflected an increase in average consumer loans during the 2010
first quarter.
Residential mortgage net charge-offs were $24.3 million, or an annualized 2.17% of related
average balances, up $6.5 million, or 37%, from the 2009 fourth quarter. The increase from the
prior quarter represents a return to a more consistent level after the impact of the 2009 third
quarter nonaccrual loan sale on 2009 fourth quarter performance. The third quarter sale had the
effect of pulling some fourth quarter losses into the third quarter. We continued to see positive
trends in early-stage delinquencies, although there continues to be valuation pressure.
Home equity net charge-offs in the 2010 first quarter were $37.9 million, or an annualized
2.01%. This was up $2.1 million, or 6%, from $35.8 million, or an annualized 1.89%, in the prior
quarter. While net charge-offs were higher than prior quarters, there continued to be a declining
trend in the early-stage delinquency level in the home equity line of credit portfolio, supporting
our longer-term positive view for home equity portfolio performance. The performance continues to
be impacted by borrowers defaulting with no available equity. We continue to focus on loss
mitigation activity and short sales, as we continue to believe that our more proactive loss
mitigation strategies are in the best interest of both the company and our customers. While there
has been a clear increase in the losses over the course of 2009, given the market conditions,
performance remained within expectations.
Automobile loan and lease net charge-offs were $8.5 million, or an annualized 0.80%, down from
$12.9 million, or an annualized 1.55%, in the prior quarter. The decline in the annualized net
charge-off percentage reflected in part the increase in average automobile balances resulting from
the previously discussed consolidation of the automobile securitization trust effective January 1,
2010. Underlying performance of this portfolio on both an absolute and relative basis continued to
be consistent with our views regarding the quality of the portfolio. We remain pleased that the
level of delinquencies declined again this past quarter, further supporting our view of improved
performance going forward.
- 13 -
Nonaccrual Loans (NALs) and Nonperforming Assets (NPAs)
Table 12 Nonaccrual Loans and Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sep. 30 |
|
|
Jun. 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
511.6 |
|
|
$ |
578.4 |
|
|
$ |
612.7 |
|
|
$ |
456.7 |
|
|
$ |
398.3 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
826.8 |
|
|
|
935.8 |
|
|
|
1,133.7 |
|
|
|
850.8 |
|
|
|
629.9 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
373.0 |
|
|
|
362.6 |
|
|
|
390.5 |
|
|
|
475.5 |
|
|
|
487.0 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans and leases
(NALs) |
|
|
1,766.1 |
|
|
|
1,917.0 |
|
|
|
2,181.1 |
|
|
|
1,818.4 |
|
|
|
1,553.1 |
|
Other real estate, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
143.9 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate, net |
|
|
152.3 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
142.6 |
|
|
|
172.9 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets (NPAs) |
|
$ |
1,918.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,058.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,344.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,002.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,775.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAL ratio (1) |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
NPA ratio (2) |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total NALs as a % of total loans and leases |
|
(2) |
|
Total NPAs as a % of sum of loans and leases, impaired loans held for sale, and net other real estate |
Total nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) were $1,766.1 million at March 31, 2010 and
represented 4.78% of total loans and leases. This was down $150.9 million, or 8%, from $1,917.0
million, or 5.21% of total loans and leases, at December 31, 2009. The decline from the prior
quarter primarily reflected decreases in CRE and C&I NALs, partially offset by an increase in
residential mortgage-related NALs.
CRE NALs decreased $109.0 million, or 12%, from the end of last year. The decrease was a
function of both charge-off activity, as well as problem credit resolutions, including pay-offs.
The payment category was substantial and is a direct result of our commitment to the ongoing
proactive management of these credits by our Special Assets department.
C&I NALs decreased $66.8 million, or 12%, from the end of last year. The decrease was also a
function of both charge-off activity, as well as problem credit resolutions, including pay-offs,
and was associated with loans throughout our footprint, with no specific geographic concentration.
From an industry perspective, improvement in the manufacturing-related segment accounted for a
significant portion of the decrease.
Residential mortgage NALs increased $10.3 million, or 3%, reflecting the impact of the more
conservative position on the timing of loss recognition and active loss mitigation and
restructuring efforts. Our efforts to proactively address existing issues with loss mitigation and
loan modification transactions have helped to minimize the inflow of new NALs. All nonaccruing
loans in this category have been written down to current value less selling costs.
Home equity NALs increased $14.7 million, or 37%. All home equity nonaccruing loans have been
written down to current value less selling costs.
Nonperforming assets (NPAs), which include NALs, were $1,918.4 million at March 31, 2010, and
represented 5.17% of related assets. This was down $139.7 million, or 7%, from $2,058.1 million,
or 5.57% of related assets at the end of last year.
- 14 -
Table 13 90 Days Past Due and Accruing Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Sep. 30 |
|
|
Jun. 30 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
Accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S.
Government |
|
$ |
113.2 |
|
|
$ |
145.7 |
|
|
$ |
127.8 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
139.7 |
|
Loans guaranteed by the U.S. Government |
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
210.0 |
|
|
$ |
247.3 |
|
|
$ |
230.7 |
|
|
$ |
246.1 |
|
|
$ |
228.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding government guaranteed |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
Government guaranteed |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing restructured loans (ARLs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
117.7 |
|
|
$ |
157.0 |
|
|
$ |
153.0 |
|
|
$ |
268.0 |
|
|
$ |
201.5 |
|
Residential mortgages |
|
|
242.9 |
|
|
|
219.6 |
|
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
158.6 |
|
|
|
108.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing restructured loans |
|
$ |
422.7 |
|
|
$ |
429.6 |
|
|
$ |
399.9 |
|
|
$ |
462.3 |
|
|
$ |
336.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percent of related loans and leases |
The over 90-day delinquent, but still accruing, ratio excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S.
Government, was 0.31% at March 31, 2010, down from 0.40% at the end of 2009 fourth quarter, and
down 4 basis points from a year-ago. On this same basis, the over 90-day delinquency ratio for
total consumer loans was 0.65% at March 31, 2010, down from 0.90% at the end of the prior quarter,
and from 0.85% a year ago.
Allowances for Credit Losses (ACL)
We maintain two reserves, both of which are available to absorb inherent credit losses: the
allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) and the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and
letters of credit (AULC). When summed together, these reserves constitute the total ACL.
Table 14 Allowances for Credit Losses (ACL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses (ALLL) |
|
$ |
1,478.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,482.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,032.0 |
|
|
$ |
917.7 |
|
|
$ |
838.5 |
|
Allowance for unfunded loan
commitments
and letters of credit |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses (ACL) |
|
$ |
1,527.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,531.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,082.1 |
|
|
$ |
964.8 |
|
|
$ |
885.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL as a % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Nonperforming assets (NPAs) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL as a % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Nonperforming assets (NPAs) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
At March 31, 2010, the ALLL was $1,478.0 million, down slightly from $1,482.5 million at the
end of the prior year. Expressed as a percent of period-end loans and leases, the ALLL ratio at
March 31, 2010, was 4.00%, down slightly from 4.03% at December 31, 2009. The ALLL as a percent of
NALs was 84% at March 31, 2010, up from 77% at December 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2009, the AULC was $49.9 million, up slightly from $48.9 million at the end of
the last year.
- 15 -
On a combined basis, the ACL as a percent of total loans and leases at March 31, 2009, was
4.14%, down slightly from 4.16% at December 31, 2009. The ACL as a percent of NALs was 87% at March
31, 2010, up from 80% at December 31, 2009.
The provision for credit losses in the 2010 first quarter of $235.0 million was $3.5 million
less than the $238.5 million in net charge-offs.
Capital
Table 15 Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Mar. 31, |
|
Tangible common equity / tangible assets
ratio |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
5.92 |
% |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
6.69 |
% |
|
|
7.82 |
% |
|
|
6.80 |
% |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
11.94 |
% |
|
|
12.03 |
% |
|
|
13.04 |
% |
|
|
11.85 |
% |
|
|
11.14 |
% |
Excess over 6.0% (1) |
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
|
$ |
2,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
14.24 |
% |
|
|
14.41 |
% |
|
|
16.23 |
% |
|
|
14.94 |
% |
|
|
14.26 |
% |
Excess over 10.0% (1) |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,907 |
|
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,246 |
|
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
42,632 |
|
|
$ |
43,248 |
|
|
$ |
44,142 |
|
|
$ |
45,463 |
|
|
$ |
46,383 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Well-capitalized regulatory threshold |
The tangible common equity to asset ratio at March 31, 2010, was 5.96%, up from 5.92% at the
end of the prior quarter. Our Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio at quarter end was 6.52%,
down slightly from 6.69% at the end of the prior quarter.
At March 31, 2010, our regulatory Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital ratios were 11.94% and
14.24%, respectively, down slightly 12.03% and 14.41%, respectively, at December 31, 2009. The
decline in our Tier 1 and Total capital ratios from December 31, 2009, was due to an increase in
the deferred tax assets disallowed for regulatory capital purposes. Both the Tier 1 and Total
risk-based capital ratio declines were partially mitigated by lower risk-weighted assets at March
31, 2010. On an absolute basis, our Tier 1 and Total risk-based capital ratios at December 31,
2009 exceeded the regulatory well capitalized thresholds by $2.5 billion and $1.8 billion,
respectively. The well capitalized level is the highest regulatory capital designation.
2010 OUTLOOK
Commenting on 2010 performance expectation, Steinour noted, The economy remains a major
factor in determining the rate of improvement in our core performance. Our assumption remains that
it will be relatively stable for the rest of the year.
We expect provision expense and net charge-offs will continue to be meaningfully below 2009
levels and show continued signs of improvement, he noted. Our allowance for credit losses is
expected to decline on an absolute basis from the March 31 level, as existing reserves are utilized
by the inherent losses in the existing loan portfolio. We expect growth in revenue. Loans are
expected to be flat-to-up slightly from first quarter levels, reflecting growth in C&I and certain
consumer loans, most notably auto-related, offset by declines in commercial real estate loans as we
continue to reduce that exposure. The net interest margin is expected to remain relatively stable
around 3.50%. We also expect to see continued growth in core deposits. Fee income is expected to
be slightly higher from first quarter levels, primarily reflecting growth in asset management and
brokerage and insurance revenue, offset by reductions in NSF/OD-related deposit service charges as
the changes in the Federal Reserves regulations are implemented. Expenses are anticipated to be
up slightly from first quarter levels, reflecting investments in growing revenues and the continued
roll-out of key strategic initiatives.
- 16 -
Taking these together, and consistent with what we have stated previously, we continue to
target $275.0 million in pre-tax, pre-provision earnings for the 2010 third quarter, he concluded.
Conference Call / Webcast Information
Huntingtons senior management will host an earnings conference call on Wednesday, April 21,
2010, at 11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time). The call may be accessed via a live Internet webcast
at www.huntington-ir.com or through a dial-in telephone number at (800) 267-7495; conference ID
65003628. Slides will be available at www.huntington-ir.com about an hour prior to the call. A
replay of the webcast will be archived in the Investor Relations section of Huntingtons web site
www.huntington.com. A telephone replay will be available two hours after the completion of the
call through April 30, 2010 at (800) 642-1687; conference ID 65003628.
Forward-looking Statement
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain plans,
expectations, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous assumptions, risks,
and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those contained or implied by such
statements for a variety of factors including: (1) deterioration in the loan portfolio could be
worse than expected due to a number of factors such as the underlying
value of the collateral could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and assumed cash
flows may be worse than expected; (2) changes in economic conditions; (3) movements in interest
rates; (4) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (5) success and timing of other
business strategies; (6) extended disruption of vital infrastructure; and (7) the nature, extent,
and timing of governmental actions and reforms. Additional factors that could cause results to
differ materially from those described above can be found in Huntingtons 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and documents subsequently filed by Huntington with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. All forward-looking statements included in this release are based on information
available at the time of the release. Huntington assumes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement.
Basis of Presentation
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This earnings press release contains GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP financial measures
where management believes it to be helpful in understanding Huntingtons results of operations or
financial position. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial
measure, as well as the reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in
this earnings release, the Quarterly Financial Review supplement to this release, the 2010 first
quarter earnings conference call slides, or the Form 8-K filed related to this release, which can
be found on Huntingtons website at huntington-ir.com.
Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income
One non-GAAP performance metric that Management believes is useful in analyzing underlying
performance trends is pre-tax, pre-provision income. This is the level of earnings adjusted to
exclude the impact of:
|
|
|
provision expense, which is excluded because its absolute level is elevated and volatile
in times of economic stress; |
|
|
|
investment securities gains/losses, which are excluded because in times of economic
stress securities market valuations may also become particularly volatile; |
|
|
|
amortization of intangibles expense, which is excluded because return on tangible common
equity is a key metric used by Management to gauge performance trends; and |
|
|
|
certain items identified by Management (see Significant Items below) which Management
believes may distort the companys underlying performance trends. |
- 17 -
Significant Items
From time to time, revenue, expenses, or taxes are impacted by items judged by Management to
be outside of ordinary banking activities and/or by items that, while they may be associated with
ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by
Management at that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. We refer to such items as
Significant Items. Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside
the company e.g., regulatory actions/assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting
principles, one-time tax assessments/refunds, etc. In other cases they may result from Management
decisions associated with significant corporate actions out of the ordinary course of business
e.g., merger/restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc.
Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than
others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility
alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses,
gains/losses from investment activities, asset valuation writedowns, etc., reflect ordinary banking
activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item.
Management believes the disclosure of Significant Items in current and prior period results
aids analysts/investors in better understanding corporate performance and trends so that they can
ascertain which of such items, if any, they may wish to include/exclude from their analysis of the
companys performance; i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed from
their expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust their estimates of future performance
accordingly. To this end, Management has adopted a practice of listing Significant Items in its
external disclosure documents (e.g., earnings press releases, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q
and 10-K).
Significant Items for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items
that may materially impact current or future period performance. A number of items could materially
impact these periods, including those described in Huntingtons 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and
other factors described from time to time in Huntingtons other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Annualized data
Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are presented on an
annualized basis. This is done for analytical and decision-making purposes to better discern
underlying performance trends when compared to full year or year-over-year amounts. For example,
loan and deposit growth rates, as well as net charge-off percentages, are most often expressed in
terms of an annual rate like 8%. As such, a 2% growth rate for a quarter would represent an
annualized 8% growth rate.
Fully-taxable equivalent interest income and net interest margin
Income from tax-exempt earnings assets is increased by an amount equivalent to the taxes that
would have been paid if this income had been taxable at statutory rates. This adjustment puts all
earning assets, most notably tax-exempt municipal securities and certain lease assets, on a common
basis that facilitates comparison of results to results of competitors.
Earnings per share equivalent data
Significant income or expense items may be expressed on a per common share basis. This is done
for analytical and decision-making purposes to better discern underlying trends in total corporate
earnings per share performance excluding the impact of such items. Investors may also find this
information helpful in their evaluation of the companys financial performance against published
earnings per share mean estimate amounts, which typically exclude the impact of Significant Items.
Earnings per share equivalents are usually calculated by applying a 35% effective tax rate to a
pre-tax amount to derive an after-tax amount, which is divided by the average shares outstanding
during the respective reporting period. Occasionally, when the item involves special tax
treatment, the after-tax amount is disclosed separately, with this then being the amount used to
calculate the earnings per share equivalent.
- 18 -
NM or nm
Percent changes of 100% or more are typically shown as nm or not meaningful unless
required. Such large percent changes typically reflect the impact of unusual or particularly
volatile items within the measured periods. Since the primary purpose of showing a percent change
is to discern underlying performance trends, such large percent changes are typically not
meaningful for such trend analysis purposes.
About Huntington
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is a $52 billion regional bank holding company
headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Huntington has more than 144 years of serving the financial needs
of its customers. Through our subsidiaries, including our banking subsidiary, The Huntington
National Bank, we provide full-service commercial and consumer banking services, mortgage banking
services, equipment leasing, investment management, trust services, brokerage services, customized
insurance service program, and other financial products and services. Our over 600 banking offices
are located in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Huntington also
offers retail and commercial financial services online at huntington.com; through its
technologically advanced, 24-hour telephone bank; and through its network of approximately 1,350
ATMs. The Auto Finance and Dealer Services group offers automobile loans to consumers and
commercial loans to automobile dealers within our six-state banking franchise area. Selected
financial service activities are also conducted in other states including: Private Financial Group
offices in Florida and Mortgage Banking offices in Maryland and New Jersey. International banking
services are available through the headquarters office in Columbus and a limited purpose office
located in the Cayman Islands and another in Hong Kong.
###
- 19 -
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED
Quarterly Key Statistics (1)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Percent Changes vs. |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
First |
|
|
4Q09 |
|
|
1Q09 |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
393,893 |
|
|
$ |
374,064 |
|
|
$ |
337,505 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
235,008 |
|
|
|
893,991 |
|
|
|
291,837 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
240,852 |
|
|
|
244,546 |
|
|
|
239,102 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
398,093 |
|
|
|
322,596 |
|
|
|
2,969,769 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
(597,977 |
) |
|
|
(2,684,999 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(38,093 |
) |
|
|
(228,290 |
) |
|
|
(251,792 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
$ |
(369,687 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,433,207 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
29,357 |
|
|
|
29,289 |
|
|
|
58,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to
common shares |
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
|
$ |
(398,976 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,492,000 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.79 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
|
|
N.M. |
% |
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.0100 |
|
|
|
0.0100 |
|
|
|
0.0100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share at end of period |
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Tangible book value per common share at end of period |
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
Average common shares basic |
|
|
716,320 |
|
|
|
715,336 |
|
|
|
366,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Average common shares diluted (2) |
|
|
718,593 |
|
|
|
715,336 |
|
|
|
366,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
(2.80 |
)% |
|
|
(18.22 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average shareholders equity |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average tangible shareholders equity (3) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (5) |
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate (benefit) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans and leases |
|
$ |
36,979,996 |
|
|
$ |
37,089,197 |
|
|
$ |
40,865,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Average loans and leases linked quarter
annualized growth rate |
|
|
(1.2) |
% |
|
|
(8.1 |
)% |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets |
|
$ |
46,240,486 |
|
|
$ |
46,847,132 |
|
|
$ |
46,570,567 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Average total assets |
|
|
51,702,032 |
|
|
|
52,458,276 |
|
|
|
54,153,256 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Average core deposits (6) |
|
|
37,271,725 |
|
|
|
36,771,778 |
|
|
|
33,037,886 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Average core deposits linked quarter
annualized growth rate (6) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,363,719 |
|
|
$ |
5,733,898 |
|
|
$ |
7,224,537 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
Total assets at end of period |
|
|
51,866,798 |
|
|
|
51,554,665 |
|
|
|
51,702,125 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity at end of period |
|
|
5,369,686 |
|
|
|
5,336,002 |
|
|
|
4,814,736 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Net charge-offs (NCOs) |
|
|
238,481 |
|
|
|
444,747 |
|
|
|
341,491 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases (NALs) |
|
$ |
1,766,108 |
|
|
$ |
1,916,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,553,094 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
NAL ratio |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets (NPAs) |
|
$ |
1,918,368 |
|
|
$ |
2,058,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,775,743 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
NPA ratio |
|
|
5.17 |
% |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) as a %
of total loans and leases at the end of period |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL plus allowance for unfunded loan commitments and
letters of credit (ACL) as a % of total loans and leases at the
end of period |
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL as a % of NALs |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL as a % of NPAs |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio (7) |
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (7) |
|
|
11.94 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
|
|
11.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital ratio (7) |
|
|
14.24 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
|
|
|
14.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio (7) |
|
|
10.05 |
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
9.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity / assets (8) |
|
|
9.26 |
|
|
|
9.24 |
|
|
|
8.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity / assets (9) |
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M., not a meaningful value. |
|
(1) |
|
Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer to Significant Items. |
|
(2) |
|
For all the quarterly periods presented above, the impact of the convertible preferred stock issued in 2008 was excluded from the diluted share calculation because the result would have been higher than basic earnings per common share
(anti-dilutive) for the periods. |
|
(3) |
|
Net (loss) income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided by average tangible shareholders equity. Average tangible
shareholders equity equals average total stockholders equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization of intangibles and
average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(4) |
|
On a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a
35% tax rate. |
|
(5) |
|
Noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles ($15.1 million in 1Q 2010, $17.1 million in 4Q 2009, and $18.9 million in 1Q 2009) and goodwill impairment divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and noninterest income
excluding securities gains (losses). |
|
(6) |
|
Includes noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits, money market deposits, savings and other domestic time deposits, and core
certificates of deposit. |
|
(7) |
|
March 31, 2010, figures are estimated. Based on an interim decision by the banking agencies on December 14, 2006, Huntington has excluded the impact of adopting ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits, from the regulatory capital calculations. |
|
(8) |
|
Tangible equity (total equity less goodwill and other intangible assets) divided by tangible assets (total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets). Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax. |
|
(9) |
|
Tangible common equity (total common equity less goodwill and other intangible assets) divided by tangible assets (total assets less goodwill and other intangible assets). Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax. |
-20-